<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A few thoughts on wine tasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artisanfamilyofwines.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artisanfamilyofwines.com/blog/?p=1575</link>
	<description>Winemaker Journal</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hanni MW</title>
		<link>http://artisanfamilyofwines.com/blog/?p=1575&#038;cpage=1#comment-3659</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hanni MW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artisanfamilyofwines.com/blog/?p=1575#comment-3659</guid>
		<description>"Which gets me to the bottom line. If these two wines got such different reactions from three different tasters, shouldn’t any wine review be taken with a grain of salt? Doesn’t the condition of the bottle, the circumstances of the tasting (particularly the food pairing), and the subjective preferences of the taster have as much to do with the assessment of the wine as the innate characteristics of the wine itself?"

I invite you to download our free report on Consumer Wine Preferences at my web site or see the review from Tim Patterson in Wines &amp; Vines: http://www.winesandvines.com/template.cfm?section=columns_article&amp;content=84604&amp;columns_id=24 

I think we can provide exciting insights and answer your questions AND completely explaing the axiom "take with a grain of salt"!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Which gets me to the bottom line. If these two wines got such different reactions from three different tasters, shouldn’t any wine review be taken with a grain of salt? Doesn’t the condition of the bottle, the circumstances of the tasting (particularly the food pairing), and the subjective preferences of the taster have as much to do with the assessment of the wine as the innate characteristics of the wine itself?&#8221;</p>
<p>I invite you to download our free report on Consumer Wine Preferences at my web site or see the review from Tim Patterson in Wines &amp; Vines: <a href="http://www.winesandvines.com/template.cfm?section=columns_article&amp;content=84604&amp;columns_id=24" rel="nofollow">http://www.winesandvines.com/template.cfm?section=columns_article&amp;content=84604&amp;columns_id=24</a> </p>
<p>I think we can provide exciting insights and answer your questions AND completely explaing the axiom &#8220;take with a grain of salt&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://artisanfamilyofwines.com/blog/?p=1575&#038;cpage=1#comment-3654</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artisanfamilyofwines.com/blog/?p=1575#comment-3654</guid>
		<description>Jeff

As you indicate, the further out a wine gets, the more variation there is in bottles.

This is why I make it a point to indicate if I tasted one bottle or two in my reviews. If there is variation or one bottle is off, then I mention that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff</p>
<p>As you indicate, the further out a wine gets, the more variation there is in bottles.</p>
<p>This is why I make it a point to indicate if I tasted one bottle or two in my reviews. If there is variation or one bottle is off, then I mention that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
